0.06/0.16 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_10721 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 1440 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 180 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:57:17 EDT 2023 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.24/0.57 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721 0.24/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.42/0.75 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA. 0.42/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh4 with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # sh2lt with pid 10903 completed with status 0 0.42/0.75 # Result found by sh2lt 0.42/0.75 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA. 0.42/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh4 with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.42/0.75 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBC 0.42/0.75 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.42/0.75 # Starting ehoh_best4 with 88s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # ehoh_best4 with pid 10905 completed with status 0 0.42/0.75 # Result found by ehoh_best4 0.42/0.75 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSLCHSA. 0.42/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo5_fix with 900s (5) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh4 with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.42/0.75 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBC 0.42/0.75 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.42/0.75 # Starting ehoh_best4 with 88s (1) cores 0.42/0.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s 0.42/0.75 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.42/0.75 0.42/0.75 # Proof found! 0.42/0.75 # SZS status Theorem 0.42/0.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_50, type, bot_bot_set_nat: set_nat). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_55, type, insert_nat: nat > set_nat > set_nat). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_62, type, type_M1006385707scheme: type_Mirabelle_typ > type_M1694694083scheme). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_78, type, type_M876316792e_FVar: nat > type_M1694694083scheme). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_88, type, type_M1690910139scheme: (nat > type_Mirabelle_typ) > type_M1694694083scheme > type_M1694694083scheme). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_105, type, type_M1050318637scheme: type_M1694694083scheme > set_nat). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_106, type, member_nat: nat > set_nat > $o). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_107, type, s1: nat > type_Mirabelle_typ). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_108, type, s2: nat > type_Mirabelle_typ). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_109, type, n: nat). 0.42/0.75 thf(decl_110, type, x: nat). 0.42/0.75 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n))|~((member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))))|((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721', conj_0)). 0.42/0.75 thf(fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X131:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X131))=(insert_nat @ X131 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721', fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.42/0.75 thf(fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X9:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X78:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X9 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X78))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X9 @ X78)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721', fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.42/0.75 thf(fact_90_singletonD, axiom, ![X26:nat, X25:nat]:(((member_nat @ X26 @ (insert_nat @ X25 @ bot_bot_set_nat))=>((X26)=(X25)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721', fact_90_singletonD)). 0.42/0.75 thf(fact_35_mk__scheme__injective, axiom, ![X31:type_Mirabelle_typ, X227:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((type_M1006385707scheme @ X31)=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X227))=>((X31)=(X227)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XEr6QR3q1a/Vampire---4.8_10721', fact_35_mk__scheme__injective)). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n))|~(member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))|((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((((s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n))&(member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))))&((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1524:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X1524))=(insert_nat @ X1524 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1492:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X1493:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X1492 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X1493))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X1492 @ X1493)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1550:nat, X1551:nat]:((~(member_nat @ X1550 @ (insert_nat @ X1551 @ bot_bot_set_nat))|((X1550)=(X1551)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_90_singletonD])])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X15:nat]:(((type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X15))=(insert_nat @ X15 @ bot_bot_set_nat))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1664:type_Mirabelle_typ, X1665:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((type_M1006385707scheme @ X1664)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X1665))|((X1664)=(X1665)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_35_mk__scheme__injective])])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X9:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X15:nat]:(((type_M1690910139scheme @ X9 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X15))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X9 @ X15)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X15:nat, X16:nat]:((((X15)=(X16))|~((member_nat @ X15 @ (insert_nat @ X16 @ bot_bot_set_nat))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (member_nat @ n @ (insert_nat @ x @ bot_bot_set_nat)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:type_Mirabelle_typ, X21:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((X1)=(X21))|((type_M1006385707scheme @ X1)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X21)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((type_M1006385707scheme @ (s1 @ x))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ x))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_14])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((x)=(n)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((((X1)=(s1 @ n))|((type_M1006385707scheme @ X1)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ n))))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19]), c_0_19])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.42/0.75 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]), c_0_21]), ['proof']). 0.42/0.75 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.42/0.75 # Parsed axioms : 463 0.42/0.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 163 0.42/0.75 # Initial clauses : 540 0.42/0.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 23 0.42/0.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 517 0.42/0.75 # Processed clauses : 1003 0.42/0.75 # ...of these trivial : 9 0.42/0.75 # ...subsumed : 121 0.42/0.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 873 0.42/0.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 164 0.42/0.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.42/0.75 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.42/0.75 # Backward-rewritten : 11 0.42/0.75 # Generated clauses : 2449 0.42/0.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2218 0.42/0.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.42/0.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.42/0.75 # Paramodulations : 2071 0.42/0.75 # Factorizations : 4 0.42/0.75 # NegExts : 9 0.42/0.75 # Equation resolutions : 196 0.42/0.75 # Total rewrite steps : 531 0.42/0.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional check models : 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.42/0.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.42/0.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 391 0.42/0.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 77 0.42/0.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3 0.42/0.75 # Negative unit clauses : 25 0.42/0.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 286 0.42/0.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2109 0.42/0.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 5686 0.42/0.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.42/0.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 392 0.42/0.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 56778 0.42/0.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39809 0.42/0.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 76 0.42/0.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2829 0.42/0.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.42/0.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 80 0.42/0.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 61 0.42/0.75 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.42/0.75 # Condensation successes : 0 0.42/0.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 75264 0.42/0.75 0.42/0.75 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.42/0.75 # User time : 0.140 s 0.42/0.75 # System time : 0.010 s 0.42/0.75 # Total time : 0.150 s 0.42/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 4960 pages 0.42/0.76 0.42/0.76 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.42/0.76 # User time : 0.155 s 0.42/0.76 # System time : 0.012 s 0.42/0.76 # Total time : 0.168 s 0.42/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 2708 pages 0.42/0.76 % E---3.1 exiting 0.42/0.76 EOF